(MESOTHELIOMA CURE) CHEMOTHERAPY: ITS GOOD AND UGLY SIDES
INCISIVE ARTICLE BY DR. SALAMATU SULE-YUSUF (TMP)+2348062845311, +22962131876
For those of you who are new to the debate, let me explain some of the pros and cons of chemotherapy. Unfortunately, there is a high probability that you or someone you know will have to face the decision on how to treat cancer.
Before we get into how chemotherapy works, it's probably worth a little digression to talk about its history. The first drug used for cancer chemotherapy was not originally intended for that purpose. Mustard gas was used as a chemical warfare agent during World War I and was studied further during World War II. During a military operation in World War II, a group of people were accidentally exposed to mustard gas and were later found to have very low white blood cell counts. It was reasoned that an agent that damaged the rapidly growing white blood cells might have a similar effect on cancer. Therefore, in the 1940s, several patients with advanced lymphomas (cancers of certain white blood cells) were given the drug by vein, rather than by breathing the irritating gas. Their improvement, although temporary, was remarkable.
That experience started researchers studying other substances that might have similar effects against cancer.
Chemotherapy is used to kill cancer cells anywhere in the body, including cells that have broken off from the main tumor and traveled through the blood or lymph systems to other parts of the body. Many doctors have successfully slowed cancer cells by using chemotherapy after a tumor has been surgically removed. How does it work? Chemotherapy drugs are cytotoxic, meaning they poison the cells in our body that multiply the most rapidly, which is how the majority of cancer cells perform. So, if your cancer cells are rapidly multiplying, you may find chemotherapy effective.
The major disadvantage to chemotherapy is that the drugs don't just kill the cancer cells that are dividing, but any dividing cell, including the multitude of healthy cells all over the body, caught in the act of dividing. For those whose “healthy” cells are multiplying faster than the cancer cells, there isn't even a theoretical chance of success. This explains why chemotherapy is effective in only 2 to 4% of cancers – primarily, Hodgkin's disease, Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, Testicular cancer, and Choriocarcinoma.
For the majority of people who have healthy cell division, you may end up killing the body before cancer. For instance, there is a high probability that certain fast multiplying immune system cells including our T and B lymphocytes will also die, contributing to our body's inability to fight opportunistic diseases that arise as a result of the treatment. Other cells that grow fast are cells of the bone marrow that produce blood cells, cells in the stomach and intestines, and cells of the hair follicles, which is why a patient's hair usually falls out.
In either event, the drug's objective is to poison the system—creating horrendous pain and illness often worse than the disease itself. The toxins attack healthy, dividing blood cells and cause blood poisoning. The gastrointestinal system is thrown into convulsions causing nausea, diarrhea, loss of appetite, cramps, and progressive weakness. Some drugs can slough the entire lining of the intestines. Reproductive organs are affected causing sterility. The brain loses memory. The hair falls out. Eyesight and hearing are impaired. The kidneys are damaged. Sores appear in the mouth and throat. The body bleeds and bruises easily and can't fight infections. Every conceivable function is disrupted with such agony for the patient that many of them elect to die of cancer rather than to continue treatment.
It makes you wonder how most people die when they report the rising cancer death statistics.
It's especially telling when a number of surveys over the years show that most chemotherapists would not take chemotherapy themselves or recommend it for their families. Today's chemotherapy drugs are the most toxic substances ever put deliberately into the human body. In fact, personnel who administer these drugs take great precautions to avoid exposure. The Handbook of Cancer Chemotherapy, a standard reference for medical personnel, offers strict warnings for handling cytotoxic agents and sixteen OSHA safety procedures for medical personnel who work around the chemicals. In addition, increased concerns regarding mutagenesis and teratogenesis [deformed babies] continue to be investigated.
The sad part is that we accept these types of results, feeling that we have no choice in the matter. We submissively believe the medical community's statement that chemotherapy “improves quality of life” even though most doctors find this absurd. Some doctors, such as Dr. Ulrich Abel, go so far as to state that there is no scientific evidence for chemotherapy being able to extend the lives of patients suffering from 80% of all cancers.
Bottom line, orthodox chemotherapy is toxic, immunosuppressant, and carcinogenic. As death rates keep going up, so why then do the majority of doctors and oncologists still push chemotherapy?
First, effective cancer treatment is a matter of definition. The FDA defines an "effective" drug as one that achieves a 50% or more reduction in tumor size for 28 days. In the vast majority of cases, there is absolutely no correlation between shrinking tumors for 28 days and the cure of cancer or extension of life. So, when a doctor says "effective" to a cancer patient, it does not mean it cures cancer—only temporary shrinks a tumor. (Sound like Disraeli again?)
Secondly, most doctors just don't know what else to do. They face patients that they feel have hopeless conditions and justify the continual loss of life brought about by these drugs because it's the only alternative they know (along with surgery and radiation). They refer to this stage not as therapy, but as experimentation, which is better than telling a patient there is no hope. As for oncologists, they have devoted countless hours to the understanding of poisonous, deadly compounds and how to administer these drugs. This too is all they know. They all want to help cancer patients, but they don't have other options in their arsenal – certainly not options that come from outside the medical fraternity.
Third, and commonly seen in all major industries, as long as drug companies and the cancer industry see profits, there will be little motivation to change. It is not surprising that the cancer industry turns over in excess of $200 billion annually. Or, that the few who sought alternative cancer methods encountered armed raids, loss of licensure, professional smearing, and ostracism. One such person is Dr. Lundberg, editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association, who stated at a recent National Institute of Health meeting, about chemotherapy: "[It's] a marvelous opportunity for rampant deceit. So much money is there to be made that ethical principles can be overrun sometimes in a stampede to get at physicians and prescribers."
And last but not least, in a small percentage of cases, chemotherapy absolutely does help – which is not to say that other approaches wouldn't work as well, or better. But it is, in fact, this minimal success rate that fuels the continued use of the therapy. Based on these occasional successes, doctors will often pressure patients to opt for the therapy even when it has little chance of success in their particular cases.
Also, it is worth noting that the benefits of chemo vary widely from cancer to cancer – sometimes improving "short-term" survivability by as much as 50%; but also, in many cases, by 1% or less. For example, the statistical chances of chemotherapy being helpful with lung cancer are less than 1 in 100, and yet doctors often pressure their patients into utilizing, what is in this case, a non-effective and debilitating treatment. And on top of everything else, the success rate for chemotherapy is highly age-dependent. It is much more likely to be effective with the young who have strong immune systems, dropping to about 50/50 by age 50. And by 50/50, I don't mean that it's effective 50% of the time, but rather that it's a 50/50 call as to whether doing chemo or nothing at all is the better option in terms of survivability. And by age 55, you're statistically better off doing nothing rather than subjecting yourself to chemo.
Keep in mind that whatever else you can say about chemotherapy, no one can ever claim it addresses the cause of cancer. It merely attacks the symptom. No one, even the most jaded doctor in the world, claims that people get cancer because they're suffering from a chemotherapy deficiency.
Obviously, there is only so much we can do with the current state of affairs and we should not expect the industry to change any time soon. However, we do not have to sit on the sidelines when it comes to our personal health and wellness due to ignorance, money, and bureaucrats.
A lot of people in the part of the world so much believe in temporary relief that they come doubtful and fearful of permanent relief...
The fact is there are Traditional medical practitioners who tackle cancer effectively!!!
ALSO READ:
WHATSAPP'S END-TO-END ENCRYPTION IS ALL FAKE AND HERE IS WHY
USERS REACT TO THE RECENT IOS 12.3, NEW TV APP AND OTHER UPDATES BY APPLE
MISSY ELLIOTT, JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE, AND ALEX LACAMOIRE HONOURED WITH DOCTORATES AT BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC
NIKE LAUNCHES APP TO MEASURE YOUR SHOE SIZE
DRAKE FLOATS NEW AIRLINE TAGS IT AIR DRAKE
THAILAND'S MAYA BAY TO REMAIN CLOSED FOR 2 YEARS
TREATING FIBROIDS HOLISTICALLY WITHOUT SURGERY
FANS SEE THE GAME OF THRONES TV SERIES AS PASSING A WRONG MESSAGE ABOUT WOMEN
IN REAL-LIFE WHO ARE THE DOTHRAKI AND WHAT'S THEIR LEGACY?
THE WORLD'S YOUNGEST DRONE-RACING CHAMPION IS ONLY 12-YEARS-OLD
PRICED SUNKEN WWII RELIC DISCOVERED IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC
ARRESTED EDO CHIEF PRIEST PUTS NIGERIAN POLICE DEPT IN CHAOS
BINANCE CRYPTO EXCHANGE LOSES $40.7 MILLION TO HACKERS (INFOMANIAC.CLUB)
1 MILLION SPECIES FACE EXTINCTION
ROBOTS EDGE CLOSER TO UNLOADING TRUCKS
'JUUL' IS THE NEW CLOAK UNDERAGED TEENS USE TO VAPE OR SMOKE E-CIGS
LIGHTSABER FENCING NOW AN OFFICIAL SPORT IN FRANCE
NEW LEONARDO DA VINCI PORTRAIT DEBUTS 500 YEARS AFTER DEATH
FIREFOX USERS LOSE ALL ADD-ONS (USERS REACTION)
MEET AABID SURTI INDIA'S 84-YEAR-OLD WATER WARRIOR
EATING MORE RICE COULD FIGHT OBESITY
SOME COGENT FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF CANCER IN THE HUMAN BODY
ALL-TIME BEST GOOGLE ALTERNATIVE FOR KIDS
THAILAND'S KING MARRY'S HEAD OF HIS BODYGUARDS
A DOZEN TECH HACKS YOU NEVER KNEW
THIS TV CAN SWITCH 90 DEGREES TO DISPLAY VERTICAL VIDEO
TEACHERS IN FLORIDA NOW ALLOWED TO CARRY GUNS
HALIMA ADEN BREAKS FASHION RECORD WITH HIJAB AND BURKINI SWIMSUIT
JAPAN'S EMPEROR AKIHITO VACATES THRONE
FANS REACT AS STAND-UP COMEDIAN DIES ON STAGE AFTER A HEART ATTACK
REVEALED: THE BIGGEST MUSIC LABELS PROFIT THE MOST FROM THE HUGE MUSIC STREAMING BUSINESS (WITH STATISTICS)
EXERCISE TIGER REMEMBRANCE: 75-YEAR-OLD WORLD WAR II TRAGEDY KEPT SECRET
MITSUBISHI IS MAKING JAPAN'S FIRST PLANE IN HALF A DECADE
TESLA ANNOUNCES PLANS TO RELEASE ROBO-TAXIS BY 2020
SAD BUT TRUE: THE NUMBER OF TREES LOST IN 2018 COULD COVER BELGIUM
SHOCKING: AMAZON'S ALEXA TEAM CAN ACCESS USERS' ADDRESSES
GOOGLE'S DRONE PROGRAM, PROJECT WING, GETS APPROVED BY FAA AS AN AIRLINE
WORLD'S FIRST MALARIA VACCINE PILOT LAUNCHES IN MALAWI, KENYA, AND GHANA
INDIAN COURT LIFTS BAN ON CHINESE VIDEO APP TIKTOK
MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY WANTS TO BAN GLASS SKYSCRAPERS
FOOD FIGHT IN ITALY REMAINS THE REAL DEAL
30 AMAZING FACTS YOU NEVER KNEW ABOUT THE GREAT BENIN KINGDOM